LinkedInShare

By Brad Fawley

Given the risks and costs of intellectual property (IP) infringement claims (even when your company isn’t found liable), most companies ideally want coverage of perceived infringement of the products they sell or the services they provide Infringement Claims, Insurance Coverage(advertisements, apps, access to websites, software, etc.).  While I have been involved in cases where courts have interpreted general liability insurance policies to cover copyright, trademark and trade dress infringement, trade secret violations and, in certain situations, even patent infringement, insurance companies are more routinely excluding this coverage.  Moreover, some insurers have changed the language of their standard general liability policies in an attempt to exclude any IP coverage.  Instead, to fill the gap left by the absence of coverage under the standard general liability policies, insurers now promote and sell specialized policies that may appear, on a quick read, to cover insureds against IP claims.

Invariably, the policies I have reviewed do not provide nearly the coverage my clients desire.  Under these policies, copyright, trademark, and patent infringement claims are rarely, if ever, covered.  At best, some purport to provide protection if the claim against the policyholder involves infringement that occurs in the course of providing “professional services.”  But even then, “professional services” is narrowly defined and, within the definition, circularly excludes coverage for certain infringement claims.  The limited coverage begs the questions: How many policyholders are going to infringe a copyright or trademark in the course of providing “professional services” to a client?  And, even if they do, is the exposure significant enough to warrant the usually high insurance premiums?

As such, your purchase of one of these policies may be a pig in a poke (actually, you may be buying an empty poke)—on the surface you may think you are covered, and your broker may say you are covered, but don’t just accept it without reading the policy yourself, carefully — if you can untangle the web of language regarding IP claims.  Certainly, if you think you are protected by your policy, you’ll want to make certain – before you need it.  (Feel free to share language from your liability policy discussing IP infringing claims in the comments—I’d be interested to see more variations on the theme).

Twitter’s PR Stunt

April 19, 2012
LinkedInShare

The last few days have been abuzz with the revelation of Twitter’s soon to be implemented “Innovator’s Patent Agreement” (IPA).  Supposedly, the IPA places Twitter in a primarily defensive posture with respect to patent litigation because the IPA requires each inventor’s approval before an offensive use of the patent.  However, for all the hype about [...]

1 comment Read the full article →

Breaking Up Is Hard To Do: Protecting Your Company When High-Level Employees Depart

April 1, 2012
LinkedInShare

I have previously written about how courts will ask, when presented with a claim of trade secret misappropriation, whether the trade secret owner took reasonable steps to maintain the confidentiality of its information (see here and here).  One of the most important ways to protect your information – and to later improve the chances of [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Call Before You Dig – Reducing the Cost of Patenting By Preparing Beforehand

March 25, 2012
LinkedInShare

So you’ve got an idea and, although you briefly thought about buying the “Do-it-Yourself” patent kit you saw offered on TV after the late show with David Letterman, you’ve decided to call a patent attorney/agent for help with the patent application.  What should you do before you make the call? Generate a thorough written description [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Got Invention? Save Time and Money When Seeking a Patent

March 5, 2012
LinkedInShare

Any patent agent or patent attorney who has been working for any length of time has undoubtedly had a call from a small company, startup, or individual inquiring about obtaining a patent.  And most, if not all, of us have had to have…the talk. First, we explain the process for filing the application and what [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Loose Lips Sink More Than Ships: So, How Much “Secrecy” Is Required To Protect Trade Secrets?

February 20, 2012
LinkedInShare

In my first post on Trade Secrets, I wrote that a trade secret is information that has commercial value, is not generally known, and is the subject of reasonable efforts to keep it secret.  So, you ask: what are “reasonable efforts” to maintain secrecy, and how much secrecy is really required? As a general rule, [...]

2 comments Read the full article →

Regulations: Inhibiting Progress or Spawning Innovation?

February 8, 2012
LinkedInShare

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recently attempted to promulgate new rules that are designed to protect downwind states from smog and fine particulates emanating from upwind coal burning power plants (it has been temporarily stymied by the U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit).  The arguments for and against the new rules focus largely [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Why Are There Eight Million Patents? (Or how to increase the value of your company by 92%.)

January 31, 2012
LinkedInShare

On August 16th last year, United States Patent No. 8,000,000 was issued by the USPTO.  And with over 400,000 new applications filed every year from 2006 through 2010, it is likely that patent number 9,000,000 will come even faster than the five years between Nos. 7,000,000 and 8,000,000.               [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

Job Creation: Campaign slogan and patent infringement defense?

January 26, 2012
LinkedInShare

In an opinion by the New Jersey District Court in December, the Court found that a requested preliminary injunction against infringement of US Patent No. 6,293,731 could shut down a port dredging project and jeopardize the creation of 2,000 projected jobs and $ 12 million in tax revenue .  “Therefore, the public interest weighs in [...]

0 comments Read the full article →

New Generic Top Level Domains: Risks for Trademark Owners

January 20, 2012
LinkedInShare

By Cathy Stadecker You’ve probably heard by now that the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) has opened the first application round for new generic top-level domain names (gTLDs).  What this means is that your organization can apply for virtually any domain name extension.  For example, Canon is planning to apply for .canon, [...]

0 comments Read the full article →